And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Mark 16:15 King James Bible

сряда, 23 декември 2015 г.

The doctrines of grace

Why I'm now a thorough "calvinist" (the doctrine of grace preached before and without calvin by baptists).


Disclaimer: I believe there are good, God serving christians, who are not of this persuasion. By this i mean the many independent baptists, who are made by the grace of God willing to selflessly serve the Lord and not conform to the world and the flesh. However, i believe this doctrine is very important for the advancement of the gospel,  correct understanding of the person and power of God, and for the security and reasonable service of the christian. I will attempt to shed light on the more difficult passages, which appear to speak unlimited atonement, whereas they don't.

NINTH 10.01.2016

One of the common criticisms of free-willers against "calvinists" is that God wouldn't command people to believe and repent if they are unable to. Yet the nation of Israel were given the decalogue and they were never capable to fulfill it, because it is unfulfillable by flesh, (they couldnt perform the ceremonial law perfectly, even). So God can command or condemn at his will, like everything else.

Next one: "the doctrine of election causes pride". I answer thus: Then Jesus put a stumblingblock and led his disciples into pride when he said "I have chosen you" (John 15)

Isaiah 41:8
But thou, Israel, art my servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham my friend.

The doctrine of election doesn't cause pride, but HUMILITY. Why? Because if you are chosen from the sea of worthless creatures, you are a "earthen vessel" and "taken from the flocks" or was "without Christ", "a cattle driver" and so forth, you have nothing to boast, as God has "chosen things which are not, to bring to nought things that are". The purpose of God of making the scum of the earth the cream of heaven is revealed in the entire scriptures. Many of the prophets were completely unaware of God's plan for them and took no pride in being CHOSEN for their great and monumental missions. That earthen vessel carries something that far surpasses it's own value, so in this juxtaposition it can find no source of pride.  The riches, power, wisdom of Christ are always underlined as opposed to our feebleness, worthlessness and ignorance.

Psalm 65
4 Blessed is the man whom thou choosest, and causest to approach unto thee, that he may dwell in thy courts: we shall be satisfied with the goodness of thy house, even of thy holy temple.

The sentences of the election of saints are never appendaged with clauses such as "because you were *****". One of the main works of God in an elect individual is to convince him of his sin, in which there is no place of pride.  Paul exalts God's mercy when talking about his election. The elect are those on the highways, who enter, because the "worthies" (religious and eminent persons, the jews etc) are just as unworthy.

For the sake of comparison, look at it this way. Which of the following two person will receive ovations and praise: The one who answers a million dollar question OR the one who wins the lottery? Making the right choice (if it was possible) with what you believe, I would say that is so, so much harder than a million dollar question. You might say "but its not the same as one requires faith and the other reason" . Yet you cannot arrive at a decision without a thought process, or can you ..... shoot in the dark? Can you say "i believe in this proposition just like that" or "because it sounds better". But if it does sound better, why so few embrace it??? There are so many problems with free-willism, its incredible, in the end it always goes in the way of biblical anthropology (the make up of man in the bible). Whereas winning the lottery..... well..... we all know how people envy those farmers, store clerks, pensioners etc who win without any effort. Because they have received something they dont deserve. And we?

SEVENTH AND EIGHT 04-05.01.2016

Historical documents of the Waldenses proving at least some of them were predestinarian.

4. We believe that there is one Holy Church, which is the congregation
of all the elect and faithful, which were from the beginning of the
world, and shall be to the end thereof — of which our Lord Jesus
Christ is the head, which is governed by his word, and guided by the
Holy Ghost: In which all good Christians ought to remain, for it prays
for all incessantly, and the word thereof is agreeable to God, without
which no one can be saved.

 -- Waldense confession of faith is extracted from “Mendes Francois,” by Charles du Moulin;

II. All that have been, or shall be saved, were elected by God before all
III. They who are saved cannot miss of salvation.
IV. Whosoever maintaineth free-will, wholly denieth predestination.
and the Grace of God.

SEPTEMBER 12, 1535. (after contact with reformers)



May it please that Lord, who formed the world, that we may be of
the number of his elect, to dwell with him in his court for ever!

-The Noble Leycon

MIN. What is that which thou believest concerning the holy church?

ANSW. I say that the church is considered two manner of ways, the one
substantially, and the other ministerially. As it is considered substantially,
by the holy catholic church is meant all the elect of God, from the
beginning of the world to the end, by the grace of God through the merit of
Christ, gathered together by the Holy Spirit, and foreordained to eternal
life; the number and names of whom are known to him who has ejected
them: and in this church remain none who are reprobate.
But the church as
it is considered according to the truth of the ministry, is the company of
the ministers of Christ, together with the people committed to their
Charge, using the ministry by faith hope and charity

-Catechism of the ancient Waldenses, for the instruction of their youth

Lindanus, a Roman Catholic bishop of the see of Ghent, who
wrote in defense of the tenets of the Church of Rome, about the
year 1560, represents John Calvin as the inheritor of the doctrine
of the Waldenses.Mezeray, the learned historiographer of France, in his Abridgment
of Chronology, speaking of the Waldensos, says, “They held
nearly the same opinions as those who are now called Calvinists.”

Gualter, a Jesuitical monk, in his chronological tables, drew up a
catalogue, consisting of seven and twenty particulars, in which he
shows that the principles of the Waldensos, and those of the
Calvinists, coincided with each other.

Eckius reproached Luther, that he had only renewed the heresiesof the Waldenses and Albigenses, of Wickliff and of John Huss, which had been long ago condemned. Bellarmine asserts, that the identical belief which was publicly taught and professed in the vallies of Piedmont, in the year 890, and onwards, was the very same which is at this day professed and
owned by the Reformed Churches.

Genebrard, a Benedictine monk, born in 1537, in the third book of
his Chronicles, calls the doctrine of Claude and his followers, in rejecting the traditions of Rome, Calvinistic doctrines; and denominates the Waldenses, Calvinists.


(warning, there is some controversy against baptists in the book, and the view that the waldenses were paedobaptist is held, but Perrin's sources THEMSELVES say that infant baptism is the work of antichrist)



Yet another problem with the free-will gospel, or i should rather say, the grace-less gospel, is that it removes the perception of a just and hell-binding God. If your gospel presentation includes statements such as "God doesn't want anyone to perish" or "God is waiting for ALL sinners to come to Him" you have effectively de-personalised God from his eternal justice. You create a schizophrenic God, who wants everyone to be saved, yet hell exists for some reason. And the carnal mind must latch on the "positive" aspect of God, discarding his judging role, and construes a God that doesn't punish severely, a Saviour from nothingness.... because God doesn't throw in hell, God doesn't want people to go to hell, God doesn't dispense wrath due to sin (but only unbelief), you can ALWAYS go to heaven or hell. (contrary to the tenor of Luke 16)  in short such salvation is very acceptable to the carnal mind, because it is a salvation from nothingness, a non-threat,  it is just a whim of the carnal mind to grab something appealing to the senses, a Christ, who is a do-all boy, a genie whom you control anytime you want.

On the other hand, if you say that God ACTUALLY WANTS SOME people to go to hell and SOME (FEW) to go to heaven, WELL IF I HEARD THAT ID BETTER MAKE SURE IM WITH THE SECOND CROWD!!! The door is small, therefore, go fast and find it!!!

I presume there is no better way to pluck men out of the SAVING hand of God, than to preach this YOU CAN DO IT NOW nonsense. If you are saving yourself, throwing yourself in hell, there is no need to rush, you have all the time of the world as you are omnipotent. But i'd say, to preach correctly , you need to unroll the plan of God for the wicked and the righteous, the total and unbroken power of God over life and will on earth, beginning to end of world and of life. And that includes the power of God over the circumstances of your salvation. The passover wasn't available all year round, Jesus wasn't on earth for more than a few years. David said "if you (if you have the ears) hear His voice, don't harden your hearts" and it is not talking about making a decision in your lifetime, later in hebrews we read "Esau sought him with tears and did not find place for repentance". Therefore you are not warned about postponing to death, but to the point where you will not be able to believe, even if you tried to and you will sink in despair and die. So urgency is due to God's plan.And to reject Christ when he is presented to you clearly, you are on the road of reprobation as you have blasphemed the Holy Ghost.

To present man as a modern Adam is horrible error, as man's constitution changed for the worse from the garden. There is, in fact, no worse example of a free creature than Adam, because he sinned in the presence of God himself. Do you dare to say you would have made the correct "choice"? Adam had some deficiency or lack of conformity before his sin, otherwise he would have stuck to God. That is the reason the second Adam creates second adams, who cannot be deceived, the first adams will ALWAYS be deceived, considering their father was deceived before the FALL!!! (1 John 5:18). Like father like sons. How much more will the sons surpass their father in disobedience on the rotten earth with the devil and his host among them. It is Christ's power to break the snare of sin and the devil to release the minds and consciences to God. In other words to undo the works of the devil in men. How idiotic is to throw all this out in the garbage bin with a simple claim to freedom of choice? Where is Christ, where is the Devil? Are they your left hand and your right? Are they your children, with whom you decide the outcome of their struggle?

Setting that aside with such appeal to reason and human will, you are flattering and enticing sinners to believe they are the ones who "set aside" their sins, it is not Christ who covers the sin, but the sinner who "gives up" his sin through the power of his will, another condensed form of the gospel of works. If this argument is proposed to free-willers they will immediately deny that they ascribe something positive in the fallen creature, but they will never provide a consistent definition of free will, except that it is..... free.

Jesus Christ is the beginning and the end, the first and the last, the author and finisher of our faith. This phraseology denotes eternity, Christ is something that goes beyond the creation (as He is God) yet the free-willers fail to see how his perpetuity isn't his mercy and love's perpetuity. God's mercy and love to his elect entails their entire lives before conversion - in the material ordering of events, stirring of emotions and bending of human will towards HIS will and continues after rebirth in the support of their faith and purity, through the intercession of the faithful Christ , to the very end (Eph 1:4-5)..The Israelites were in God's positive will even before they were in the testicles of Jacob. He didn't simply drop his law and prophets on their heads as he suddenly decides to include them in his will. Not just their lives of faith. When Christ says to John "I am the first and the last" this is his immediate comfort for the chosen for the kingdom, that their sins are forgiven - beginning to end, that their faith is secure-  from the giving to the reclaiming to heaven, that God's plan is good for those who are within his eternal love. But baptists choose to clip off God's positive will before salvation (which is by them claimed initiated by the person!) and make God a follower, not a leader.

SIXTH 26.12.2015 

One of the better references for the particular love/atonement of John 3:16 is Deutoronomy 10
15 Only the LORD had a delight in thy fathers to love them, and he chose their seed after them, even you above all people, as it is this day.

Psalm 16:3 But to the saints that are in the earth, and to the excellent, in whom is all my delight.

Continuing with "little flock". The catholics have massive problems with such verses. They anticipate world dominion. If God has provided free will for all, then sooner or later all would be COMPELLED (either by human reason or force...) to enter the church. The standard methods of changing one's mind would be sufficient.But human eloquence or threatening without or intermingled with the gospel produces false converts - hypocrites or self-deluded slaves. The flock of Christ is drawn by His "cords of love" alone, without human interference.. Not that His love is little, but it is applied to a  select few.

Luke 12:32
Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.

In fact, if you believe in free will in divine matters, then you should also believe that conversion is a matter of persuasion or intellectual conviction..... Yet the carnal mind is enmity to God and the greatest orators and preachers have left millions unsaved after their sermons.People have attended churches for decades dying in disbelief, even if hearing the gospel almost daily and being begged by their relatives to reconsider.If free will is the entry point of faith, what makes the believing different from the others? Some kind of  hidden"common sense"? What makes you more reasonable than your philosopher or logician or mathematician friend. What makes you more understanding than your linguist or psychologist neighbour? What exactly makes you more special? And what makes the "decision" of accepting Christ different than any other decision? I have heard baptist pastors preaching that the faith of Christ is just like any other human conviction, following a deliberation. What blasphemy! True preachers of the gospel can attest that the conversion and repentance is not a decision but a miraculous change (sometimes even against the perceived/professed will of the person, which wonderfully, unexpectedly, without any prior thought, without season (time), is conformed to the will of God), as it was with my wife, who literally broke down in tears, infused with the power of the Holy Ghost. What makes you more special? All who believe have received the faith from above and should not boast of a whimsical "decision".(1 Cor 4:7) He chose us.

FIFTH 25.12.2015

One point of contention between the free willers and predestinarians is the scope of election. The scripture is clear on this matter. The elect WILL BE FEW. Therefore, if God was supposed to want the salvation of all and would have left men with the means to at least approximate that wish, the saved would at some point be a majority or at least a sizeable minority. This also fits with the free-willistic interpretation of 2 Peter 3:9, where they interpret the desire of God as the desire for the salvation of the entire human race.


9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

Here, however the patience and longsuffering is towards US., the elect, as with Paul

16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.

The patience of God is manifest only towards those who he has foreseen and preordained. We are to exhibit the same patience with respect to His coming, as there might be many more generations of elect to be born after us and gathered. 

Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain.

However, with the progress of generations comes the increase in tares and chaff, so that more people go to hell with each generation. If God was patient &c towards the unbelieving, he would have sent more means of grace and would have saved a lot more in proportion to the unbelieving. God and Noah waited for the ark to be built, that period was used for the condemnation of the world, not for its salvation (Heb 11:7; Rev 11:5). The two witnesses give rain where God wants (speak the words of grace and convert souls; Heb 6:7), and breathe fire on the rest (Heb 6:8), which symbolically means condemnation to hell (one are baptized in water&holy spirit, the other in fire Mat 3:11,12).(The reprobates have a timer on their own - to fulfill their sins and the sins of their fathers (The works of unrighteousness from their like-minded predecessors) (Ps 92:7; Genesi 15:1; Rev 14:15)

Now would be convenient to explain the dual role of the gospel, but i leave that for another time.


To be continued.....

Fourth 25.12.2015

Let me get this straight. Jesus died for EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, but only EXPLICITLY prays for those whom the Father had given, and for those who will believe? This further proves that he died for those of the world, who will believe, either with him or with the apostles and their disciples, and not for the totality of human beings in the world.

John 17:9
I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me;

Why do so many "evangelicals" hate "calvinists"?. Precisely because they are not saved. They maintain free will, because "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." It is scary for the flesh to be in the hands of God (under the positive or negative will). Therefore for the unsaved sinner it is appeasing to have an "open door" of denying Christ, when he isn't desired or of accepting him at a later time, when the body is worn down for sin. Because they don't want to "hear his voice" and want to postpone, like constantine and others. However that  is not possible. Otherwise everyone could live ungodly and only accept christ at his deathbed. God is not mocked. The passover was to be eaten on the same night. The Holy Spirit visited the world in the appointed time, to produce the fruit of salvation, Christ. So it visits and saves the sinner in an appointed time. It is not for us to choose the time of our salvation.

Third 24.12.2015

Thanks for Avles' comment to direct my mind to an important fact about the blood covenant.

"northern baptists/waldenses were free-willers and the southern/albigenses were predestinarians"

Very interesting, thank you for your info, this add further spiritual fuel for the struggle against the wiles of Satan, and his machinations to hide the martyrdom of Bogomils and others, the elect of God. They are scared of it because those martyrs speaks well of predestination. If you let the neighbor to slain you it means you are fully aware you are an elect, and of predestination.

 This is the key here. The elect of God know they are the sheep for the slaughter and accept it. They accept the slaughter of Christ as a Saviour/Righteous man for their sin and accept their own slaughter as his blood-kin. Whereas the persecutors accept the slaughter of Christ as an evil-doer and the slaughter of the righteous as his associates.

And the persecutors of the righteous WERE NEVER included in the covenant of blood, as that covenant is offered only on behalf of the RIGHTEOUS(BY GOD). Abel's FATLING SACRIFICE WAS NEITHER FROM, NOR FOR CAIN. The PASSOVER was NEITHER FROM, NOR FOR THE EGYPTIANS.

4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:


what John 3:16 says.  

16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

Free willers and baptists usually say that "whosoever" means that Jesus died for all and so "anyone" can be saved. However this verse says that whosoever believeth (i.e. ALL THAT BELIEVE,   ANYONE of the believing) will be saved.

It doesn't say "
God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that noone should perish"

That doesnt mean we shouldnt preach the gospel, but that many people will not get saved, because God will not grant them faith and repentance. This verse actually teaches election and predestination, not an offer for all. Jesus died for the believing of all nations (the world).



I have never read Calvin's books. I have read Gill's commentaries and a few other books on different subjects, but never a "systematic theology", only brief expositions of passages. Folks, its (un)common spiritual sense.

A copy of my comment towards a baptist minister preaching against the doctrine of predestination

Pastor, the jews also clinged to jesus through their choice, to which Jesus was aware when He said:

65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Thereby destroying their "free choice" hubris.

You don't need the greek to have common sense: 

Which is come unto you, as it is IN ALL THE WORLD; and bringeth forth fruit, as it doth also in you, since the day ye heard of it, and knew the grace of God in truth:

And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, BELIEVED ON IN THE WORLD,

Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached IN THE WHOLE WORLD, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her.

The entire world was not evangelized in the first two decades after Jesus' death and we don't mention the woman in our modern missions worldwide. (Therefore the word world (cosmos) doesn't always signify the entire world, and actually it is almost never used in the sense. The context of Jesus dying for the World reveals that the meaning is not that he died for all people born, but that  he saves not only jews, who think they are special, but gentiles from all provinces of the roman empire - THE *FIRST* WORLD KNOWN AT THAT TIME. He gave his life not only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, but of the children abroad, the sheep of the other fold, the branches to be grafted etc., which of course leads a man to believe he has his own BEYOND THAT REALM., which should be gathered. What God was telling the jews was "Jesus died not only for israel, but for the NATIONS of the world. This completely destroys the notion that limited atonement makes people anti-missionary minded . The correct exegesis of the "dying for the world" make a case for missionary effort, SINCE CHRIST HAS ELECT IN THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE WORLD TO BE GATHERED; FROM EVERY KNEE, TONGUE, NATION, TRIBE.  REVELATION 5:9)

  Millions and millions are in hell, never having heard the gospel. Did they get the same "chance", pastor? 

  Also, you claim God loves everyone. Yet we are commanded to

1 John 3:18 in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

If God loves the unbelieving the same way he does the CHOSEN, then he is a hypocrite, because he doesn't love them in deed (in reality).

If God is

1. Omnipotent
2. All-loving

Why doesn't he save everyone?
Ah, but you will say "He wants to leave it up to them".
So he leaves it up to them, when they are enslaved to sin, which they senselessly indulge in, captive by the devil, blind and dead in sins, ignorant of the life of God? Do you leave your kid to decide what's best for him? You would surely agree that leaving a kid to himself spells disaster. God doesn't discipline us into salvation, but creates a loving and obedient NEW creature in us, that is not only capable, but willing of faith, repentance etc.

Pastor, the God you describe is weak, unloving and indecisive.
The God of the bible brings power unto salvation, opens hearts and grants faith and repentance. The God of the bible's love for HIS BRIDE is larger than the world, let alone my puny human brain and its mental faculties.
The God of the bible worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.
He doesn't wait or hope man "receives him".
He knows whats inside man. 

An undeserving sinner, saved not by choice, but by the powerful grace of God.

понеделник, 21 декември 2015 г.

bogomil mafia bogomil communism bogomil terrorism bogomil aliens(?)

Yesterday, after a little search I stumbled across and old article on the bogomils, in a magazine called executive intelligence review by a certain Lyndon LaRouche movement. The magazine is actually well written, certainly at a higher standard than most conspiracy literature and is quite long running. The contents are a mix of anti-british and anti-slavic propaganda. Anyway, the interesting part (article) is in the open and uncompromising slander against the religious history of Bulgaria, in an effort to link the bogomils with the attack on John Paul II, with some discussion of gnosticism in there. Anyway, this is the article with an accent on the link between the "gnostic" bogomils and the later communist government and agencies of bulgaria, participating in international drug and arms trade.

Read the rest in the link....

You can see how the Vatican establishment still hates the bogomils and their offspring - the albigenses, cathari and patareni, by making them look like heretics through various lay gnostic and occult organizations who claim them as forefathers , so that Rome can stamp them as heretics.

How were the bogomils gnostics escapes me, when they didn't worship a feminine figure. I'd rather say that the "MOTHER OF GOD "worshipping, GNOSTIC GOSPEL translating orthodox monks were and are the true gnostics. After all, why would Clement of Ochrid's students translate the gnostic gospels into slavonic? To study the heresy? Please..... Just like how the desert father collected(or wrote?) gnostic literature for personal study of heresy. VERY FUNNY.

And in italy, which is always under the monotone whisper of the weak jesuit voice against the truth, these people are vilified as ancestors of the current waves of low level criminality that terrorizes the italian citizens.
The so called "allegorical slander", italian fascist anti-balkanism, further fueled by anarchists with hoods, who represent the political and religious upheaval done by disillusioned romans, under the influence of patareni ideas of Arnold of Brescia.

From November 14 circulates on the Internet in fact a policy paper in which the anarcho-insurrectionist promise a "Black December" and call for "placing explosive devices against fascists and bosses, display banners on bridges and roads, flood the city with posters and flyers, to blow up the houses of politicians, throwing Molotov cocktails at the police. " And the campaign "Black December" should serve as a "detonator recovery anarchist insurrection in and out of prisons."The anarcho-insurrectionist track therefore is more credited (excluded by the Interior Minister Angelino Alfano that of international terrorism) and the investigation took off immediately with the findings of the agents of the Cabinet of Scientific Police and checkpoints throughout the province. Looking for the man of average stature tall, with an athletic body that images of surveillance cameras resume arrive with a bag and put it in front of the door and then walking away.That person - must clarify whether she was alone or someone waiting around in a car - had his face covered with a hood up and a cap. ......  "....

After 900 years the ghost of the Bogomils - part 3: paramilitary 'Arnoldists' terrorizing Brescia

Yes, anarchists, bulgarian thieves, islamists from the balkans (nevermind the mafia, but it is good because its "italian", right?) and so forth, all feelings to spread into the world like wildfire, when the fascist empire is born.

Burglary (LOL), the Bulgarian key that opens all doors

(translated with google translator!)

Secondo una leggenda, lo strumento dei ladri sarebbe stato inventato dagli 007 di Sofia ai tempi della Guerra fredda. Parliamo della chiave bulgara, spauracchio dei proprietari di abitazioni. Infatti, come ricostruisce La Stampa, l'arnese è utilizzato da bande specializzate, principalmente dell'Est Europa. Unica soluzione? Dotarsi di una serratura di ultima generazione con chiavi piatte e tracciate.
Ma come funziona la chiave bulgara? È una chiave morbida dentro la quale inserire grimaldelli-chiavistelli della misura adatta. È capace di leggere i codici della serratura e viene poi sovrapposta a un secondo attrezzo e ruotata lentamente da destra a sinistra. Finito questo lavoro, basta tornare alla base e con un piccolo tornio creare la chiave perfetta quasi al millimetro. Il metodo della chiave bulgara funziona solo con la serratura a "doppia mappa", quindi il primo rimedio potrebbe essere quello di passare al "cilindro europeo". Che, tuttavia, per essere ancora più sicuro, come spiega un fabbro citato dalla Stampa, deve essere di classe 6, cioè prevedere 100mila combinazioni ed essere protetto da un ottimo defender, una copertura in acciaio resistente a ogni tentativo di spezzarlo.

According to legend, the instrument was invented by thieves 007 Sofia at the time of the Cold War. We talk about the key Bulgarian bogeyman of homeownership. In fact, as rebuilds La Stampa, the tool is used by specialized gangs, mainly from Eastern Europe. Only solution? Acquire a lock of latest generation with flat keys and tracked.But how does the key Bulgarian? It is a key soft inside which picks-insert bolts of appropriate size. It is able to read the codes of the lock and is then superimposed to a second tool and rotated slowly from right to left. Finished this work, just go back to the base and with a small lathe to create the perfect key almost to the millimeter. The key method of Bulgarian works only with lock "double bit", then the first remedy would be to go to the "European cylinder." That, however, to be even safer, as explained by a blacksmith quoted by the press, it must be of class 6, which is to provide 100 thousand combinations and be protected by a very good defender, a steel cover resistant to any attempt to break it.

Where did the bogomils enter and with what key? In the hearts of the Milanese and with the key of the gospel.The Milanese and other northern italians were the fruit of balkan Bogomil evangelization. The key of the gospel, which unlocks hearts and Satan can't stop it.

 Revelation 3:
7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth;  
8 I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.

                                                      Not even the antichrist can lock the gospel:

2 Timothy 2:9

Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, even unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.

Woe to those who say God is the Devil

Bogomil spooks 

"sola fide" ca 950

петък, 18 декември 2015 г.

Trump will unleash Putin in Europe

Donald Trump Defends Putin’s Murder of Journalists: : ‘Our Country Does Plenty of Killing


And they will elect Trump. Freedom of speech is being destroyed. Just goes to show how the fascist empire of the jesuits is already halfway out of the womb of the belly of the whore. Putin and Trump are the john the baptist scapegoats of the future unholy roman empire.

EJP's "comedy"

EJP dressed in a black shirt with a weird black hat and even stranger comments.....

четвъртък, 17 декември 2015 г.

Man of sin, bait of Satan

I have no time to write comprehensively

Today, pope Francis' birthday, is 666 days to 13 October 2017, the deadline for Russia.

777 is the magic number of fate in gnosticism. The true occult meaning of 21.12.2012 is 21 21 20 21 or 3x777. The new agers prophesied of a global change of consciousness at that date. That is a mockery of the future global revival (Rev 11:13; 14:5-8) which will follow the destruction of the Harlot, before Jesus returns, the so called end of the world. The ancient Egyptians believed ISIS was a destroyer of fate, as did the gnostics with Sophia. Thats why in the movie the matrix "trinity" and the "oracle" destroy the calculations of the "architect".

They put 777 and 17 on display, because, as we said earlier, the harlot believes she will escape the 7 bowls of wrath and her destruction by some kind of theater tragedy play, with pope Francis as the bait, to fool God. (Rev 16;17). Imitative of God who used Christ as a bait to destroy the forces of Satan (Col 2; Ps 22:6).

This  is behind the plot of the "old man and the sea" by Hemingway, a work referenced in the Denzel Washington gnostic movie "The Equalizer".

    In 1954, American author Ernest Hemingway donated his Nobel Prize in Literature medal for The Old Man and the Sea in thanksgiving to the image of the Virgin Mary at the shrine of Caridad del Cobre in Cuba

 The idea is that the old man("ancient of days") is God, the merlin fish is the pope (dagon/FISH HAT) and the sharks are ISIS. The fisherman initially manages to capture the merlin, but the sharks eat it up, leaving his efforts futile, so he gives up on fishing. Therefore the merlin or rather the fish are the victors. This is nothing else than simonian gnosticism from the times of the apostles. Simon Magus took pagan goddess mythology, samaritanism and kabbalism and formed the roots of anti-christianism, with a dying anti-messiah

"....Did Travis survive the shoot-out? Are we experiencing his dying thoughts? Can the sequence be accepted as literally true? ... I am not sure there can be an answer to these questions. The end sequence plays like music, not drama: It completes the story on an emotional, not a literal, level. We end not on carnage but on redemption, which is the goal of so many of Scorsese's characters."

The mystery of Sophia-Epinoia is great indeed, insoluble in its origins; for how does that which is Divine descend below and create Powers which imprison their parent? It is the mystery of the universe and of man, insoluble for all but the Logos itself, by whose self-sacrifice Sophia, the Soul, is finally freed from her bonds............

Simon Francis

Bearded FISH goddess of Syria - Nero and gnosticism (pt2)

I wouldn't be surprised at all (my conjecture) if it all was THE OTHER WAY AROUND and Simon Magus was actually instrumental in the persecutions and martyrdoms of Paul (and Peter) and that he had some kind of positive relationship with Nero. After all, the "Harlot of Tyre" or "Sophia", whom Simon Magus was said to have rescued, was none other than the Syrian Goddess, the same which Nero exclusively worshipped.

And Hemingway's adventures in Italy::

Ernest Hemingway in the old lands of Bogomils:

Thursday, July 26, 2012
" her good pleasure".

A Farewell to Arms is a novel written by Ernest Hemingway set during the Italian campaign of World War I. The book, published in 1929, is a first-person account of American Frederic Henry, serving as a Lieutenant ("Tenente") in the ambulance corps of the Italian Army. The title is taken from a poem by 16th-century English dramatist George Peele.[1]
A Farewell to Arms focuses on a doomed romance between Henry and a British nurse, Catherine Barkley, against the backdrop of the World War I, cynical soldiers, fighting and the displacement of populations.

петък, 11 декември 2015 г.

Putin the chief archon #2 - the beast heading east

‘Something Better To Come’

Her name is Yula. She lives in Putin’s Russia. Her home is the largest garbage dump in Europe. This is the story of her life.
Ten-year-old Yula has but one dream – to lead a normal life. For 14 years, Oscar-nominated filmmaker Hanna Polak follows Yula as she grows up in the forbidden territory of Svalka, the garbage dump located 13 miles from the Kremlin in Putin’s Russia. Something Better To Come is Yula’s story – a dramatic tale of coming of age and maturing to the point of taking destiny into one’s own hands. It is a story of hope, courage, and life, all shot in gripping vérité style that stuns with its directness and immediacy............

This is a recent documentary by a certain pole Hannah Pollak about the life of a wretched girl in a Moscow dumping grounds. The movie follows the girl over 14 years, from the beginning of Putin's reign, and yet the Russian gov. does nothing to improve the conditions there, get the people out, or stop the production? Isn't this a golden chance for Putin's propaganda to show kindness of heart and intervene in these people's plight? Or is the production on the order of someone ABOVE Putin?  I would say it is:

Yeah, it is about Sophia, AGAIN. Seems to me that these plays/ displays become more sinister and blasphemous every year.

So we have a dumping ground. This is representative of the material world of the Archon, in which he  keeps souls and beings of light, after depriving them of their spark. 

So Sophia, captive to the darkness, sings:

"'10. I was in the darkness and in the shadow of the chaos, bound with the mighty fetters of the chaos, and no light was in me."

Clearly, Sophia is bound within the confines of the material world, which is repulsive and abominable to a creature of light like her. Yula is sensible of her condition and fate and dreams of an escape. The gnostic jesus promises the captured beings a better world:

"And if I lead you into the region of the rulers of the Fate, then will ye see the glory in which they are, and because of their overtowering great glory ye will deem this world before you as darkness of darknesses, and |185. ye will look at the whole world of men, how it will have the condition of a speck of dust for you"

The coat of Yula is BLACK, a symbol of her completely unglorious state. Of course, she is seen stepping into the light, escaping the darkness of the material confinement. We have seen this in other material and in the black madonna icons and statues.


From "the Equalizer" with jesuit educated Denzel Washington. Sophia saved from prostitution at the hands  of Vladimir Pushkin at the end of the movie.

She then is free to SHINE IN HER FULL LIGHT as night and day. Revelation 12:1.


Nice star-studded jacket.   NIGHT AND DAY. Or
"a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars". This movie is about the restoration of Sophia to glory (light), following her long captivity in darkness by the archons. "Mary" will soon appear, first in Russia, then in a very major (A.Rivera) way in the USA and China.

Sigourney Weaver in the Alien 3.

[.......I am become as a demon apart, who dwelleth in matter and light is not in him (fallen Sophia), and I am become as a counterfeiting spirit, which is in a material body........
And forthwith the lion-faced power, it
p. 87and all its emanations, surrounded. Pistis Sophia, desiring to 'take away the whole light in Sophia. It came to pass then, when they oppressed Sophia, that she cried to the height, crying unto me that I should help her. It came to pass then, when she looked to the height, that she saw Self-willed exceedingly wrathful, and she was in fear, and uttered the twelfth repentance because of Self-willed and his emanations.

It came to pass then, when the angels had come down into the chaos, they and the light-stream, and moreover [when] all the emanations of Self-willed and the emanations of Adamas(evil Adam) had seen the light-stream, how it shone very exceedingly and there was no measure for the light about it, that they became terror-stricken and quitted Pistis Sophia. And the great light-stream surrounded Pistis Sophia on all sides of her, on her left and on her right and on all her sides, and it became a light-wreath round her head.

"It came to pass then, when the light-stream had surrounded Pistis Sophia, that she took great courage, and it ceased not to surround her on all her sides; and she was no longer in fear of the emanations of Self-willed which are in the p. 117
chaos, nor was she any more in fear of the other new power of Self-willed which he had cast down into the chaos |139. as a flying arrow, nor did she any more tremble at the demon power of Adamas which had come out of the æons.........]

Pistis Sophia chapters 39; 55; 66

 What is not shown here is that Yula later gives birth to a baby. I've already mentioned that the apparitions to take place in Russia will be interpreted as the vision of John in Revelation 12, only it is not the Church (naturally the correct interpretation), but Mary, giving birth to a "christian" Tzar. The Tsar will then appear, being born of Mary 

Revelation 12:
1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:

5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

                  Yulia's baby going east. Clothed with Sun (Yellow t-shirt) and standing on the moon (Blue skirt).

This is the traditional catholic/orthodox interpretation of the verses: Mary giving birth to an emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. This, according to most catholics, protestants and orthodox was once fulfilled in Constantine, but a future fulfillment is not excluded. Therefore the captive to Putin Sophia is to step into the light and give birth to the new Russian Tzar. And what else? From the title it is implied he is going to be a better Saviour than Jesus Christ

"SOMETHING BETTER TO COME". Something better than Putin (understand Christ and his kingdom). In the poster we have three people in the background, walking WEST (from the east/right) each carrying a different load. And there is an arrow seemingly giving direction to somewhere. Familiar? How about these guys?

Matthew 2:

1 Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, 
2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.

.......and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense and myrrh.

Yula is facing the other direction, EAST, showing that "Mary" is turning away people from the fleshly Jesus Christ and is about to conquer Asia (as the future of the church is in Asia and Africa..... ). The impression here is that the incarnation of Christ is the darkest moment and the cause of the bondage of souls in contrast to the liberating birth of the king. But before that can be done, the chief Archon embodiment needs to be removed and his power dissolved. I have not been able to obtain the documentary, but the poster and summaries give away enough. We are dealing with insanely evil people over here.

Oh, and what the funding page had on yesterday:

Thanks, but no thanks.

 On what Putin's regime is meant to be by the gnostic mind:

Larisa Arap (Russian: Лари́са Ива́новна Ара́п; born in 1958) is a Russian opposition activist who became a victim of involuntary commitment in the psychiatric facilities of Murmansk and Apatity, soon after publishing her article about mistreatment of patients in the same hospital where she was committed in July, 2007.[1][2][3][4][5][6] She was released after 46 days of confinement, on August 20, 2007

Arap’s story, entitled “Durdom” (“Madhouse”), was prepared by journalist Ilona Novikova and published on June 8, 2007 in the Murmansk edition of the newspaper "Marsh Nesoglasnykh" (named after the "Dissenters' March"). The newspaper is a part of the United Civil Front, an opposition coalition led by former world chess champion Garry Kasparov. Her story described crimes that allegedly took place at the Apatity psychiatric facility, including the following:[9][10][11]

  • Forcing children to kiss and massage the legs of staff members at the hospital; children who refused were punished by electroshock 'therapy'.

Rape and torture of people in the psychiatric wards.
Two days later, on July 7, 2007 (777), Arap’s husband and daughter were allowed to visit her at the hospital. Arap claimed that she was severely beaten by the medical personnel and had bruises all over her body. She was tied to her bed and treated with unidentified 'sedatives'. To protest, Arap went on a five-day hunger strike, and was eventually fed by force...........

"I feel very sick... I have no idea what they gave me but I have memory loss. I lost all sense of time and can’t remember much of what they did to me. They tied and beat me. It was torture. I saw other perfectly sane people inside." - Arap

"This is THE FIRST ARCHON who took a great power from his mother. And he removed himself from her and moved away from the places in which he was born. He became strong and created for himself other aeons with a flame of luminous fire which (still) exists now. And he joined with his arrogance which is in him and begot authorities for himself. ......And he did not obey the place from which he came......


Putin is Vera's [illegitimate, unwanted by her husband(consort)][lost son given for adoption]who[moved to russia],[climbed in the KGB and became president surrounding himself with an oligarchic ring]and 8 years later
[started the war against his native

Putin, the Villain Archon

Also check:

Vadim pays a visit to Nikolay and Dmitri.


Dmitri and Vadim meet to discuss the situation. Putin portrait in the background.

A scene with the last supper in the background. This may indicate the willingness of the Orthodox church to get rid of Putin in exchange for more power and money.

Leviathan in Russia

събота, 5 декември 2015 г.

Break time - bored and tired

I'm mentally tired from most conspiracy untangling and it is not a "fruit of righteousness". I'm taking a short break from posting, as i have TONS of work. May continue with the gnostic stuff after a while. Peace of Christ with those who believe from the heart.

петък, 4 декември 2015 г.

Damsels in distress

  1. California massacre victim ranted about Muslims on Facebook



    A Jewish man who was slain in the San Bernardino massacre had a heated argument with the gunman about Islam being a violent religion just two weeks before the shooting that killed 14 and wounded 21.

    Nicholas Thalasinos, a devout Zionist, became furious with Syed Rizwan Farook, a fellow restaurant inspector, during work, declaring that the Muslim man “doesn’t agree that Islam is not a peaceful religion.”

    On the night before he was slain, Thalasinos — who maintained a Facebook page filled with anti-jihadi barbs — warred online with a Muslim fanatic who threatened to kill him.

    “My new hobby appears to be BLOCKING PAGAN ANTI­SEMITIC TROGLODYTES so I’m just passing this along to warn others,” Thalasinos posted.

    His online adversary Tuesday night was a UKRAINIAN who posted as “Med Ali Zarouk” and who had drawn Thalasinos’ ire with an anti-Semitic rant.

    You will never sucsseed [sic] to make a country for jews,” the UKRAINIAN had written, “because you are criminals and cowards . . . soon you’ll get your ass kicked, you will die and never see israel as country believe me never.”

    But Jennifer also said she believed Farook may have been radicalized “behind the scenes” in the years before Wednesday’s mass shooting but wasn’t showing “that part of himself” at work.

    If Farook had shown his true colors, “my husband would have had something to say,” she said.

    That same year, the widow said, Nicholas became a “born again” Messianic Jew, devoting himself to Jesus.


    ?????????? UKRAINIAN MUSLIMS,

    "BORN AGAIN" MESSIANIC JEWS FOR ISRAEL  ???????????????????


  2. “They got along,” she said. “As far as I know, [Syed] got along with everybody. That’s what’s so shocking.”

    Soon all christians, who refuse to bow to earthly jerusalem and the pope will be suspected of having TRUE COLORS.

    Psalms 59:3
    For, lo, they lie in wait for my soul: the mighty are gathered against me; not for my transgression, nor for my sin, O LORD.

    PIZZA NUTS - predictive programming

    I would laugh if it wasn't worth crying

    RAQQA 2015 = WARSAW/KATYN 1944